The US president is right that a global change is necessary, just not the one he seeks, Moscow believes

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told journalists on Monday that Russia agrees with US President Joe Biden's comment made last week that the current global order has lost steam. However, he added that the outcome may not align with the White House's expectations.

"The world indeed needs a new order, based on absolutely new principles," the Russian official claimed.

According to Peskov, the new arrangement should be based on "international laws, not [arbitrary] rules" and devoid of attempts "to concentrate all mechanisms of global governance in the hands of a single nation." He believes that Moscow differs significantly on this point.

"Whatever new world order the US envisions, it means an American-centric world order. A world revolving around the US. This will not be anymore," Peskov added.

Biden delivered his comments about an impending shift during a speech at a fundraising event in Washington last Friday. The US president highlighted his successful effort in uniting Japan and South Korea to support Ukraine against Russia as an exemplar of his administration's unifying endeavors.

Tokyo and Seoul agreed to do this "because they understand if they remain silent, they may be next," Biden claimed, suggesting that Washington can "unite the world in ways that it never has been" if it is "bold enough."

"We were in a post-war period for 50 years where it worked pretty damn well, but that's sort of run out of steam," Biden mused. "It needs ... a new world order in a sense."

This reality can be achieved, the president said, because "we're the United States of America, for God's sake" and there has "never been a thing we've set our mind to [that] we haven't been able to accomplish."

"Name me one crisis we ever got into where we haven't come out stronger in America. Name me one. Name me one where we went in and didn't come out stronger," he challenged the audience.

During Biden's term in office, the US ended a two-decade military engagement in Afghanistan, the longest in its history. Among other things, the campaign cost the lives of 2,448 US military service members and 3,846 US contractors, according to the Brown University Costs of War project.

The US had spent hundreds of billions of dollars on security and reconstruction efforts, which were mired with graft and waste, according to the office of the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR).

The Taliban militant group toppled the US-backed government in Kabul before the pullout was completed.

(RT.com)